PgDip Acute Medicine
01 Sep 2024 - 31 Aug 2030
| Course Leader | Karl New |
|---|---|
| Course Team | |
| Awarding Body | University of South Wales |
| Teaching Institutions | Learna Ltd |
| Modes of Study | Part Time |
Document Version
| Version | 2 |
|---|---|
| Valid From | 01 Sep 2024 |
| Valid To | 31 Aug 2030 |
QAA Benchmarks
Educational Aim
The course aims to
To provide graduates with a systematic understanding of acute medicine, skills in critical appraisal and application of knowledge for direct patient benefit/service development and future study.?
To provide graduates with life-long learning and advanced problem-solving skills that they can apply to clinical practice in acute medicine.
To enable graduates to demonstrate the ability to lead complex tasks and processes in the delivery and advancement of acute medical specialty-related care.
To produce graduates who can effectively translate and disseminate evidence-based acute medicine information to a wide range of audiences where there are many interacting factors.
Learning Outcomes
| A1 | Apply a systematic understanding of specialised knowledge and employ a specialist theoretical and methodological approach in relation to Acute Medicine. |
| A2 | Make informed judgements by critically evaluating a variety of information sources and analysing developments in Acute Medicine, assessing their relevance in various settings |
| A3 | Critically employ extensive knowledge of Acute Medicine to devise and apply advanced problem-solving strategies, methods, and techniques for designing systematic investigations that define and critically evaluate problems, using specialist information and data in unpredictable and complex contexts. |
| A4 | Systematically synthesise specialised information and data within contexts related to complex Acute Medicine scenarios, and formulate innovative proposals to address strategic issues or opportunities. |
| A5 | Systematically and critically evaluate the methodologies and methods relevant to addressing research issues in Acute Medicine. |
| B1 | Systematically and critically assess current research and advanced scholarship in Acute Medicine, synthesising information and advanced methodologies to elucidate and substantiate conclusions and recommendations. |
| B2 | Autonomously make strategic decisions and assume responsibility for addressing intricate Acute Medicine problems. |
| B3 | Apply advanced principles and concepts to critically develop systematic responses in addressing complex Acute Medicine scenarios that may involve interfacing factors. |
| B4 | Apply systematic and creative evaluation of intricate issues stemming from diverse information sources that underpin practice in Acute Medicine. |
| B5 | Conceptualise and design a project to strategically enhance personal learning, identify and justify methodologies, and develop advanced methods for academic inquiry. |
| C1 | Design and develop management strategies for investigating and treating/managing acute medical conditions. |
| C2 | Systematically analyse practical treatments for utilisation across a variety of patient population groups and practical interventions in diverse settings related to Acute Medicine. |
| C3 | Cultivate and apply a range of leadership and organisational skills across various settings related to Acute Medicine. |
| C4 | Conceptualise and develop advanced processes which may lead to enhance or initiate substantial developments in Acute Medicine. |
| C5 | Proficiently organise and communicate information using criteria at the cutting edge of knowledge for the advancement of specific areas in Acute Medicine. |
Course Structure
Level 7 Modules
| Module Code | Module Id | Module Title | Module Status | Credit Value | Module Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE4S182 | MOD010556 | Respiratory and Cardiovascular Emergencies | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S183 | MOD010559 | Diabetes and Endocrine Emergencies | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S185 | MOD010562 | Acute Presentations with Infection and Sepsis | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S186 | MOD010565 | Acute Neurological Disorders and Stroke | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S187 | MOD010566 | Acute Renal, Metabolic and Toxicological Emergencies | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S288 | MOD013522 | Gastrointestinal Emergencies | Running | 20 | specified |
Teaching and Assessment
Learning and Teaching Methods
The programme is delivered fully online via a Learning Management System (LMS) referred to as the software brand name ‘Moodle’ and can be accessed by any student with an internet connected device. The LMS is a ‘mobile first’ platform, enabling students to access their learning environment on various desktop or handheld devices.
The PGDip programme (year 1) comprises six modules running sequentially over a calendar year, each module is 6 weeks duration with a 2-week break in between (with longer breaks at Christmas and during the summer) to allow for tutor marking on completion of each module.
The MSc (year 2) comprises two modules running sequentially over a calendar year; module 1 (research methodologies and critical appraisal skills) runs for ten weeks and module 2 (professional project) is twenty-eight weeks in length.
The role of the tutor is to facilitate students’ learning rather than to provide didactic teaching. The tutor will stimulate the students to pursue appropriate lines of academic inquiry in the Academic Forum and provide direction to facilitate meeting the module learning outcomes. It is a seminar environment where the tutor and student group engage in critical appraisal and discussion of the topic area.
Throughout each module, tutors are available for academic support and are contactable by the students via responses on the Academic Forum. Tutors can also provide students with one-to-one academic support via a private messaging facility on Moodle.
The Reflective Journal also provides a forum in which a tutor can provide one-to-one feedback to their students.
During the programme, students can access the learning platform 24 hours a
day, 7 days a week to find online resources, access the online forums and complete their
work. Because of this, international students face no adverse effects from working in
different time zones.
Each module comprises four assessment types, which every student completes during the six-week study period. The four assessment types and weighting are as follows:
Academic Forum (40%) - case-based scenarios posted by the tutor in the academic forum challenge learners to critically appraise evidence and apply theory to practical situations
Reflective Journal (10%) - demonstrates how learners reflect on action, learn and change as a result of that reflection
Module Activity (20%) - individual activities are designed to stimulate personalised learning, creativity and problem solving; group activities foster a multi-disciplinary approach to problem solving and current ways of working
Case-based Multiple Choice Exam (30%) - tests theoretical knowledge and its application in a clinical setting which enhances the learners’ critical thinking analytical skills in a time-controlled setting.
Employer Engagement
Employer Engagement will be achieved by:
Work-based Learning
Students, already employed, will directly apply the knowledge gained on the course with their everyday working practice
Means of Assessment
The PG Diploma comprises six modules of 20 credits which run sequentially over 1-calendar year, examining aspects of the field of acute medicine.
The course is wholly online and can be accessed by any student with a computer and access to the internet. Students are put in virtual tutor groups of 10-20 and they use a discussion forum to interact with the tutor and rest of the group.
The MSc consists of the PGDip modules plus a 20-credit module on research methods and critical appraisal using a similar format to the PGDip modules (including the same assessment components), followed by a 40-credit Professional Project module where students study a topic in depth, using the knowledge acquired in the preceding modules. In this module, students choose a topic and carry out independent study with one-to-one supervision from the tutor.
The format of the six modules of the PGDip and module 1 of the MSc follow the same pattern and module structure. During a module, students will use the course website several times a week to follow discussion threads, make their own contributions and interact with the tutor and fellow students. There is no didactic teaching, instead, students are asked questions and prompted to go and search the literature, read it critically and respond to their tutors and peers in the Academic Forum.
There are four components of assessment to assess the learning outcomes of each module.
Academic Forum (Case based scenarios and discussion) 40%
Students are required to critically analyse clinically focused case-based scenarios, discussion threads and weekly questions posed by their tutors via the Academic Forum (an online discussion board) and designed to meet the module learning outcomes. Here, students make their own researched and referenced contributions and interact with the tutor and their fellow students. There is no didactic teaching, instead, students are posed questions and prompted to search the literature, read it critically and respond. Engagement is encouraged by the tutor prompting students to respond and the use of automated activity monitoring software.
At the end of each module, the tutor allocates marks to each student based on a marking rubric. The rubric takes into account the following elements:
Promptness and initiative
Delivery of post (spelling and grammar)
The relevance of post and referencing
Expression within the post
Contribution and engagement with the learning community
Students learn by finding relevant literature, reading and critically appraising it; discussing it within the discussion forum and applying it critically to practise. Engaging in case problems is highly motivational for students and introduces the key concepts of the module. It is perceived as being particularly valid for their clinical work and is a prominent feature found in the needs assessments of practising healthcare professionals.
The content of case discussion is based on the learning outcomes for the module.
Reflective portfolio 10%
The online learning portfolio requires students to record and critically reflect on their learning. Reflection is an important aspect of the course since the healthcare professionals will be able to spend time considering how their practice compares to the themes being discussed in the module. The tutor provides formative feedback to the student throughout the module and marks it at the end of the module. Reflective practice is a requirement for healthcare professionals for professional re-validation and professional development.
Module activity (Group or Individual) 20%
The group activity stimulates and tests the student’s ability to work individually and as a team in taking the subject area of acute medicine forward. A group task is set, such as the development of a care guideline. The group elects a leader (designed to put leadership skills into practice) and the leader allocates tasks to group members. The leader is responsible for managing, collating and submitting the activity (online) at the end of the module. All students contribute to the group activity and provide an individual submission on some aspect of the subject. The tutor provides guidance throughout the module and marks the assessment at the end.
The individual activity is designed to stimulate and demonstrate personalised learning, creativity and problem solving with application to each student’s own area of practice.
Examples of activities might include either a written assignment, scientific poster, blog or social media project.
All students must complete the same assignment activity for each module, which is predetermined by the Programme Leader before the modules commence. Students are not provided with an option to choose.
Case-based multiple choice exam 30%
Case problems in the form of a one-hour timed online examination with ‘single best answer’ questions directly test the clinical reasoning and knowledge objectives of the module. The online exam is marked automatically. The examination tests acute related theory and problem-solving skills.
In summary, the case-based scenarios challenge students to apply theory to the clinical situation, the reflective portfolio demonstrates how they reflect on action, learn and change as a result of that reflection. The group activities foster a multi-disciplinary approach to problem solving and current ways of working and the individual activity fosters learner autonomy. The multiple-choice case based examination tests theoretical knowledge and its application.
The diverse assessment methods within each module are designed to test the expected characteristics of Masters graduates (QAA Characteristics’ Statement, 2020). These include critical awareness of current issues and developments in acute medicine, critical skills, knowledge of professional responsibility, integrity and ethics and the ability to reflect on their own progress as a learner.
Learning Support
The learning support available through the course
Induction
All students are enrolled on a Study Skills orientation module which serves as their induction in the week preceding the start of the programme.This module provides the students with an entire week of induction and resources. Representatives from the Student Services Department are available throughout the induction week to answer queries and problems as they arise and provide support.
The module has been specifically designed to help students prepare for the start of the programme. However, they can also access the module throughout the entire course as an essential reference guide.
The module introduces them to the online learning, navigation of the learning platform Moodle and study skills support, including the elements of assessment, referencing, critical appraisal, reflective practice, levels of evidence and how to write scientifically. The use of referencing software, advanced literature searching and accessing other academic and research libraries is also covered.
The module is available for all students online throughout the course.
Students have full access to a designated in-house Student Services team for the full duration of the course.
Personal Academic Coach
Academic support is given on a module-by-module basis by a subject specific tutor. Student Services and Teaching Services Departments within Learna provide continuity of support throughout the course with input from the Learna Programme Leader where required.
Students are encouraged to contact their module tutor for academic queries and the Student Services Team for other help and advice.
If a student discloses that a subject is sensitive to them because of personal circumstances, the tutor can respond on an individual basis.
Each student can contact any member of the Student Services Team who act as their point contact for any concerns they might have, e.g., arrangements for extensions. Student Service officers monitor students' participation in the learning platform, providing encouragement and guidance to help them keep up with the pace of studies and contact them if they fall behind. Students can book calls with a Student Services Officer.
Student Services also contact the Teaching Services team who will work with the tutor to encourage and guide specific students through direct messaging.
Learner Analytics
Student and tutor engagement and participation is monitored throughout the course by the Student Services and Teaching and Learning Teams respectively and who will intervene where required.
Office hours
9am-5pm Monday to Friday for office support with the learning platform; however, tutors are contactable over weekends as well as during the week.
Student Services also offer an appointment booking service where students are able to schedule a call to go through any queries about their enrolment and Moodle (the learning platform) throughout their time on the course. This enables international students in different timezones to have direct contact with the Student Services Team at a time convenient to them.
Tutorials
One tutor provides learning guidance per 10-20 students. They are available for academic support and are contactable via Moodle. The role of the tutor is to facilitate students’ learning rather than to provide didactic teaching. The tutor will stimulate the students to pursue appropriate lines of academic inquiry in the Academic Forum and provide direction to ensure the module learning outcomes are met.
Seminars
The Academic Forum is the discussion board where a large proportion of the learning and assessment for each module takes place. It is a seminar environment where the tutor and student group engage in critical appraisal and discussion of the topic area.
Formative Assessment
Formative assessment is provided on a weekly basis via feedback in the Academic Forum as well as one-to-one formative feedback that takes place via the Reflective Journal component.
Progress meetings
Student Services Officers monitor each student’s participation in the learning platform, providing encouragement and guidance to help them keep up with the pace of their studies and will contact them if they fall behind. Following student feedback, the Student Services Dept now provide Student Participation Reports which are sent to students regularly.
Research Supervision
N/A
Online Resources
The online content resources take the form of tutor instruction documents which are pre-written scenarios and discussion prompts that are posted by the tutors throughout the week to seed debate and discussion amongst the students.
The online resources for students include:
An online study skills preparation week, with continued access to it throughout the course for revision purposes.
Access to USW’s online library facilities.
The Learna Library resource provides online reading resources and links to search engines.
Module-by-module reading lists on the Moodle website provide students with direct links to recommended reading material that can be accessed throughout the course.
A WhatsApp social channel provides an area for the students to converse in a more informal way.
Advice Zone
Students have full access to the University of South Wales Advice Zone as well as a designated in-house Student Services Team (from Learna) for the full duration of the course.
The range and availability of Learna’s Student Services is as follows:
Student Services Officers monitor their students' participation in the learning platform, providing encouragement and guidance to help them keep up with the pace of their studies and will contact them if they fall behind.
Students are able to book calls with their Student Services Officer. Student Services also contact the Teaching Services Team who will work with the tutor to encourage and guide specific students through direct messaging.
The Student Services Team has developed a knowledge base resource which answers many frequently asked questions and is fully accessible via a link on Moodle for the duration of the course.
The Student Services Team provides 9am-5pm office hours by telephone throughout the course (including between module breaks). Students can also book out of hours calls via an acuity service to take into account the differing time zones of international students.
Email enquiries are responded to within times set by Learna, aiming to reply to students within 2 working days.
Extra staff are brought in during busier times, e.g., the start of a cohort, to provide additional support. Student Services Team members can work weekends prior to the important end-of-module submission dates.
For academic queries, students can message their tutors in a number of ways. They can ask queries via their tutor group on the Academic Forum, or they can privately message their tutor on Moodle at any time for one-to-one academic support. The Reflective Journal also provides a forum in which a student can reflect on issues and receive one to one feedback from the tutor.
Students complete feedback surveys at the end of every module, the results of which are collated by the quality team and assessed internally as well as contributing to continuous monitoring reports for USW. Where feedback leads to change, this is reported on the ‘Student Voice’ section on Moodle in a ‘You said, we did’ area, so that the students get direct responses to any feedback that brings forth change.?
Each cohort has a Student Representative who is invited to attend a Staff-Student Liaison meeting (and forming part of Learna’s regular cycle of Academic Board meetings). It is attended by representatives of Learna and USW (including the Course Link Officer and Librarian).?Minutes and actions of the meeting are published on Moodle.
Students are also able to access the University Wellbeing service to discuss any issues which arise from their course via USW Wellbeing.
Disability
In all cases of disability, the Learna Student Services Team will work with the student on an individual basis.
Students with any Specific Learning Difficulties (SpLD) or disabilities are supported by Learna's Student Services Team in line with the recommendations set out in the student's Individual Support Plan (ISP).
IT/Library
Students have full access to the University of South Wales Library and IT department.
Course Exit Points
| Award | Criteria | Final |
|---|---|---|
| Postgraduate Diploma | 120 credits of which at least 90 must be at Level 7 and no more than 30 at Level 6 | Final |
| Postgraduate Certificate | 60 credits with at least 40 at Level 7 and no more than 20 at Level 6 | Exit |
Progression Route
Students who have successfully completed the 120-credit Postgraduate Diploma in Acute Medicine may continue to the MSc in Acute Medicine
Following the Masters, students would be likely to take on roles in wider healthcare systems and can access further opportunities in their field.
Entry Requirements
Admission to the course is typically through the following qualifications:
Applicants will be assessed on an individual basis, but typically, applicants for the programme will:
Possess a first degree in a relevant subject awarded by a UK university or overseas equivalent.
Provide evidence in the personal statement as to how they can apply learning to a practical setting and reflect on practice.
Basic IT skills (e.g., word-processing, email and internet)
If English is not the student’s first language they must hold an English language qualification
English Requirements:
6.0 (with a minimum of 5.5 in each band) -including expired
With a score of 72 overall and a minimum of 18 in reading, 17 in listening, 20 in speaking and 17 in writing (including Home Edition)
English grade C or above
Advanced (CAE): exams taken from January 2015- overall score of 169 with at least 162 in each component; exams taken before January 2015- Grade C and no less than borderline in each skill
English Language qualifications: ISE II Distinction or ISE III Pass
With a score of 64 overall and 59 in each component. Please note that where a UKVI SELT is not required, we can also accept the scores in the PTE Academic Online
B2 Communicator Exam with a high pass with a score of 33 in each component
Inclusive Curriculum Statement
The University of South Wales operates a policy of inclusive learning, teaching and assessment to ensure that all students have an equal opportunity to fulfil their educational potential. Course teams will have considered ways of designing out any potentially disadvantageous element of courses during the course design process. However some specific needs may remain, details about how to apply to have your needs assessed can be found at: http://unilife.southwales.ac.uk/pages/3040-disability-and-dyslexia-service/
Addendum for Delivery at a Partner Institution
N/A
Methods Of Quality Standards
Course Management
\\rThe course management follows the University requirements for partner organisations and adopts the University’s quality assurance processes: for example, module evaluations are completed by the students at the end of each module and fed into Module Review Forms; academic infringements are dealt with by the Student Administration Team in the first instance, but further infringements require the team going to the Faculty Advice Shop, which follows USW procedures.
\\rThe University provides a Course Link Officer (Karl New) who oversees all links with Learna Ltd. Each course also has its own course link tutor provided by USW, who works in partnership with Learna Ltd. The Course Link Officer reviews student applications and oversees module content in order to maintain USW quality procedures, in collaboration with our internal Course Director (see below).
\\rLearna Ltd therefore also has its own internal quality assurance processes. These include a Course Director who is a subject expert with oversight of the course content, currency and quality. The Course Director internally moderates tutor training, input and marking, and oversees the question setting process. The Course Director is held accountable for the course at termly Academic Directorate meetings held jointly between USW and Learna Ltd. At these meetings, courses are reviewed and quality assurance issues addressed. The University Faculty link officer attends the meeting and provides updates on USW quality assurance procedures. This process ensures that changes to USW policies and procedures are fed back to Learna Ltd. in a timely manner.
\\rTutors who facilitate the students learning are clinical subject experts. After the identification of a new tutor, Learna request that they complete an RTS application form and return it with a copy of their CV. This documentation is initially reviewed by the Course Director before submitting to the University’s quality team for final approval. Once approved, and as part of their training, they are asked to shadow an approved tutor and group of students for a six week module. At the end of the module they must provide marks for two of the students in the group. The student work is double-marked, the marks are reviewed and feedback is provided to the trainee tutor by the Course Director. Once a tutor has completed tutor training and it has been approved by the Course Director, can they then look after their own group of students, with supervision.
\\rAcademic Offences
\\rThis course adheres to the University of South Wales Academic Misconduct Regulations. The main categories of academic misconduct are:
\\r• Intention to break the regulations
\\r• Plagiarism
\\r• Cheating
\\r• Contract Cheating
\\r• Falsification
\\r• Recycling
\\rOn initial suspicion of an academic offence being committed by a student, the course tutor will communicate with the student in the first instance and notify student support.
\\rIf the matter is not resolved at this stage, the student will be reported to the University Academic Misconduct panel for further investigation and potential penalties may be issued.
\\rArrangements for Feedback to Students
\\rIn line with USW requirements, student provisional results and feedback are provided within 20 working days after the submission deadline. Before provisional results and feedback are released, the results are quality checked. Individual feedback is provided on the course website once students have completed the module feedback form.
\\rOn completion of the PG Diploma, the University subject board will ratify the marks for each module and following the award board, students will be notified of their official results.
\\rStudent Representation
\\rThe on-line nature of the course and geographical spread of students precludes student attendance at University meetings. Feedback is obtained from all students at the end of each module and the end of the course. The Course Director and Learna Ltd.’s Academic Directorate meeting review comments and suggestions are incorporated where appropriate.
Quality Of Standards Indicators
Course Monitoring
\\rThe University is responsible for both the standards of its awards and for the quality of its students’ learning experience. In order to ensure that standards are maintained and there is continuous enhancement a process of regular review, known as annual monitoring take places. This purpose of the process is to evaluate and improve course quality, ensure the best possible student experience within the resource available and to identify and disseminate good practice. It also ensures that appropriate action is taken to remedy any identified shortcomings and enhance provision.
\\rThe mandatory student feedback obtained from all students is fed into the module review forms and made available to the course leader.
\\rExternal Examiner
\\rExternal examining provides one of the principal means for maintaining UK academic standards within autonomous higher education providers. The majority are drawn from other higher education institutions in the UK. In some cases there will be external examiners drawn from industry or practice.
\\rThey provide carefully considered advice on the academic standards of the courses and/or modules to which they have been assigned, and can offer advice on good practice and opportunities to enhance the quality of those courses/modules. They are also able to offer an informed view of how standards compare with the same or similar awards at other higher education providers (primarily in the UK, and sometimes overseas as well) of which they have experience.
\\rExternal examiners provide of annual written reports to the University based on what he/she has observed of the University’s assessment processes and student assessed work.
\\rThe external examiner(s) associated with this course are recorded in the Course Handbook.
\\rEngagement with Subject Benchmark Statements, QAA Quality Code, CQFW and FHEQ
\\rThe course educational aims and learning outcomes are based on the terminology used in the QAA Master’s Degree Characteristics (September 2015) and the Credit and Qualifications Framework for Wales (2009). There are no subject specific benchmark statements for acute medicine.