MEng Aeronautical Engineering
01 Aug 2025 - 31 Aug 2027
| Course Leader | Ilias Lappas |
|---|---|
| Course Team | Darren Williams, Robert Warren, Ck Tan, Colin Morgan, Joao Ramos, Mohamed Mohamed, Shee-Meng Thai, Xiao Guo, Matthew Jones, Olusanjo Fadiya, Vishagen Ramasamy, Christian Hall |
| Awarding Body | University of South Wales |
| Teaching Institutions | University of South Wales |
| Modes of Study | Full Time, Full Time Sandwich, Part Time |
Document Version
| Version | 8 |
|---|---|
| Valid From | 01 Aug 2025 |
| Valid To | 31 Aug 2027 |
QAA Benchmarks
Educational Aim
The overall aim of this award is to produce an engineer with a specialist education related to aeronautical engineering who also has the versatility and depth of understanding necessary to deal with new and unusual problems of the aerospace industry. She/he should be imaginative, creative and able to implement change as well as providing technical leadership. Graduates from the MEng programme in particular are also expected to be capable of demonstrating managerial/ team leadership qualities. The awards contained within the scheme should produce high calibre engineering graduates who are;
Motivated to practice engineering and equipped to play leading roles in industry, the professions and public service.
Able to work independently and effectively, both as individuals and as part of a team, to design and develop solutions to meet engineering standards.
Recognised internationally as highly competent engineering graduates who possess the necessary management tools to support engineering decision making.
Aware of the current state of research and technological advancements in aeronautical engineering.
Aware of the financial, moral, legal, economic, environmental and cultural constraints and obligations under which they practice with particular emphasis on sustainability that impact on engineering decisions.
Enthusiastic, articulate, questioning and open minded
Committed to and prepared for continuous professional development & lifelong learning.
The MEng course had been designed to comply with the standards and expectations specified in the Engineering Council’s UK Standard for Professional Engineering Competence (UK-SPEC, 3rd edition), together with the latest RAeS Accreditation Guidelines (2018) for CEng accredited courses.
Learning Outcomes
| A1 | Appropriate mathematical methods |
| A2 | Appropriate engineering science & technology |
| A3 | General principles of design |
| A4 | Research to support technical activities/solve problems |
| A5 | Management and business practices |
| A6 | Professional and ethical responsibilities including issues concerning sustainability & the environment |
| B1 | Select and apply appropriate mathematical and/or computer based methods for modelling and analysing engineering problems |
| B2 | Apply scientific principles to the development and analysis of engineering solutions |
| B3 | Apply engineering technology to the development of solutions for engineering problems |
| B4 | Evaluate the design of new processes or products through synthesis of ideas from a wide range of sources |
| B5 | Produce engineering solutions which encompass technical risk evaluation |
| B6 | Evaluate Business Risk |
| C1 | Appropriate mathematical methods for modelling and analysing engineering problems |
| C2 | Relevant test and measurement equipment including experimental laboratory work |
| C3 | Engineering IT Tools |
| C4 | Practical tools for the testing of synthesised engineering systems |
| C5 | Information retrieval systems |
| C6 | Apply engineering techniques taking account of industrial and commercial constraints |
Course Structure
Level 4 Modules
| Module Code | Module Id | Module Title | Module Status | Credit Value | Module Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AM1S50 | MOD010118 | Mathematics for Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineers | Running | 20 | specified |
| NG1S206 | MOD001273 | Design and Manufacture | Running | 20 | |
| NG1S228 | MOD001278 | Engineering Mechanics 1 | Running | 20 | |
| NG1S242 | MOD008372 | Thermofluids 1 | Running | 20 | |
| NG1S234 | MOD008968 | Electrical Science | Running | 20 | |
| NG1S217 | MOD008969 | Engineering Computing Applications | Running | 20 |
Level 5 Modules
| Module Code | Module Id | Module Title | Module Status | Credit Value | Module Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NG2S243 | MOD010042 | Engineering Materials | Running | 20 | specified |
| NG2S254 | MOD010513 | Further Engineering Mathematics | Running | 20 | specified |
| NG2S310 | MOD008699 | Aircraft Systems Integration and Performance | Running | 20 | core |
| NG2S231 | MOD001298 | Control and Instrumentation | Running | 20 | |
| NG2S242 | MOD008373 | Thermofluids 2 | Running | 20 | |
| NG2S311 | MOD008972 | Aeronautical Design | Running | 20 | |
| GEPU203 | MOD013664 | Professional Practice and Sandwich Placement | Running | 120 | specified |
Level 6 Modules
| Module Code | Module Id | Module Title | Module Status | Credit Value | Module Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NG3S238 | MOD010121 | Engineering Computational Analysis | Running | 20 | specified |
| NG3S363 | MOD012320 | Propulsion | Running | 20 | specified |
| NG3S310 | MOD008973 | Aircraft Structure | Running | 20 | |
| NG3D362 | MOD012322 | Integrative MEng Group Project | Running | 40 | |
| NG3S362 | MOD012319 | Aircraft Flight Dynamics | Running | 20 |
Level 7 Modules
| Module Code | Module Id | Module Title | Module Status | Credit Value | Module Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NG4H245 | MOD001340 | Further Finite Element Analysis | Running | 10 | |
| NG4H246 | MOD001341 | Further Computational Fluid Dynamics | Running | 10 | |
| NG4H312 | MOD008703 | Aeroelasticity | Running | 10 | |
| NG4S311 | MOD008976 | Advanced Propulsion | Running | 20 | |
| NG4H218 | MOD008977 | Advanced Materials and Manufacture | Running | 10 | |
| NG4S258 | MOD010514 | Professional Engineering Management | Running | 20 | |
| NG4D241 | MOD012323 | Individual Project | Running | 40 |
Teaching and Assessment
Learning and Teaching Methods
Employer Engagement
The subject area has an Industrial Advisory Group (IAG) which meets twice a year. This group had been consulted on the re-validation process, and discussions have been carried out for the proposed changes. As a result, their views had been taken on board in the development of the revised plan. The IAG also provides a forum which allows closer links between the industries represented and USW in terms of ongoing collaboration which includes support for research based project work, site visits, industrial guest lectures and student placements/ internships.
Means of Assessment
The assessment strategy reflects the requirements of the University’s academic blueprint and consists of a balanced array of assessment methods which had been carefully devised to measure the skill and competence of a student. As such assessments are designed to meet the learning outcomes of an individual module and therefore collectively within a coherent course structure, this satisfies the learning outcomes of the course as stipulated by the professional bodies. Means of assessment include formal unseen examinations, timed assignments, essays, reports, project work, group-based project work, independent projects, poster presentations and oral presentations.
Modules which are used to develop the student’s understanding of engineering principles are normally assessed through the formal year end examinations. These exams typically contribute between 50% and 70% of the available marks for the module, with the remainder being allocated to practical, assignment work or test. The design, project (individual and group) and computer-based modules are 100% coursework assessed. At all five levels of assessments, the examinations are normally three hours duration for a 20 credit module.
Oral presentations are utilised through all levels, particularly in design, individual and group-based project modules. This addresses the workplace/ industry’s requirement for engineers to be able to confidently present information across to an audience. Peer assessment is also used in the group based activities. In certain modules, phased class tests are used to gauge student engagement and prepare them for the final examination which normally carries a heavier weighting.
The assessment profile, together with its weighting and number of assessments (student workload), is presented for all levels in the later sections. The development of key skills is incorporated throughout the programme. It is located within the module descriptor and is related to the relevant assessments, as appropriate. The attainment level for each of the learning outcomes and key skills is indicated by the number of occurrences stated in the learning outcomes and key skills matrices. Students will experience a diverse and rewarding array of assessment procedures within their respective course of study.
Learning Support
Students undertaking taught modules within the subject area receive academic support from the module leader who liaises with the individual academic staff who might also be involved in the delivery to ensure consistency of both teaching and assessment. Students undertaking project based work/ modules which are largely self-directed receive academic guidance from the supervisor on a regular basis, typically weekly, to keep up with progress. Students are also encouraged to keep a logbook in order to help plan/ manage their work. A member of academic staff is also appointed to manage the allocation and overall running of projects, and to prepare samples for external verification.
Students on placement receive support from the industrial liaison and training officer, who assists with finding placement, provides advice on completing CVs and preparing for interviews, and subsequently provides support to the students when on placement. Students are visited at least once during their placement to discuss the University requirements with the respective on-site work placement supervisor/ officer.
Additional support to enhance the students learning experience include;
• One week induction programme for new students.
• Student online induction schedule, course structure, learning timetables, University calendar year, assessment dates, and the University regulations.
• Online database which contains the syllabus, assessment plan, learning outcomes for modules on their course.
• Blackboard as an on-line source of learning information, and communication portal for modules.
• Student email accounts to facilitate communication with staff.
• Modern suite of labs with technician support for design based, project work.
• Open door policy of academic staff.
• Student Development and Study Skills Service providing help with referencing & study skills for example. • Grad Edge – http://gradedge.southwales.ac.uk offered by the University student services which provides advice/ help with preparing CVs, application and cover letters, job searching, work experience and volunteering
Course Exit Points
| Award | Criteria | Final |
|---|---|---|
| Master of Engineering | 480 credits of which at least 100 must be at Level 7 or above, 120 at Level 6 or above, 120 at Level 5 or above, 120 at Level 4 or above | Final |
| Bachelor of Engineering (with Honours) | Honours 360 credits, of which at least 100 must be at Level 4 (Certificate) or above, plus 120 credits at Level 5 (Intermediate) or above, plus 120 credits at Level 6 (Honours) or above. | Exit |
| Bachelor of Engineering (Unclassified) | 300 credits, of which at least 100 must be at Level 4 (Certificate) or above, plus 120 credits at Level 5 (Intermediate) or above plus a further 60 credits at Level 6 (Honours). | Exit |
| Diploma of Higher Education | 240 credits, of which at least 100 must be at Level 4 (Certificate) or above, plus 120 credits at Level 5 (Intermediate) or above. | Exit |
| Certificate of Higher Education | 120 credits of which at least 100 credits must be at Level 4 (Certificate) or above. | Exit |
| Foundation Certificate in Higher Education | 120 credits of which at Level 3 (access) or above. | Exit |
Progression Route
Foundation Progression to the BEng (Hons) Aeronautical EngineeringStudents are required to obtain a minimum of 100 credits with a typical Level 3 average of 60% at the Mathematics modules(Students who do not meet these requirements will be offered entry to the 1st Year of the BSc (Hons) Mechanical Engineering.Progression Threshold onto the MEngBEng (hons) Aeronautical Engineering students who typically achieve an overall weighted average of 60% and more at Year 2 will be offered the opportunity to transfer onto the MEng course.
Entry Requirements
Admission to the course is typically through the following qualifications:
The arrangements for admissions will seek to ensure equality of opportunity for all applicants.
The University Regulations on Admissions (A.2.3) as defined in the “Regulations for Taught Courses” will be adopted wherever possible. It will be expected that anyone admitted onto an award will be able to fulfil the objectives and standard of the award.
Evidence will be sought of an applicant's professional and/ or educational experiences that provide indications of ability to meet the demands of the programme.
In general, international applicants will need to have achieved an overall IELTS grade of 6.0 with a minimum score of 5.5 in each component.
The entry criteria below shows the qualification range within which the University will make offers. Most offers we make are at the top of the range, but we take all aspects of an application into consideration and applicants receive a personalised offer. Combinations of qualifications are acceptable and other qualifications not listed here may also be acceptable.
Typical A-Level Offer
BCC - CDD to include Mathematics and one other Science subject (this is equivalent to 104-80 UCAS tariff points).
Typical Welsh BACC Offer
Pass the Advanced Welsh Baccalaureate Diploma with Grade C/D in the Skills Challenge Certificate and BC - CD at A Level to include Mathematics and one other Science subject (this is equivalent to 104-80 UCAS tariff points).
Typical BTEC Offer
BTEC Extended Diploma Distinction Merit Merit - Merit Merit Pass in a relevant Maths, Science or Engineering subject which must include Maths modules (this is equivalent to 112-80 UCAS tariff points).
Typical IB Offer
Pass the International Baccalaureate Diploma with a minimum score of 29 overall including a score of 5 in Mathematics and one other Science subject at Higher Level. You will also need to obtain a score of 5 or above in English at standard level.
Typical Access to HE Offer
Pass an Access to HE Diploma in Maths, Science or Engineering and obtain a minimum of 80 UCAS tariff points This programme can demonstrate its quality through: Internal moderation Annual Reports by the External Examiner Annual monitoring Faculty Quality Assurance Committee auditors Student feedback Investors in People status Highly supportive QAA institutional audit Quality of degrees awarded in the subject area. Industrial Advisory Committee Industrial prizes awarded to achieving students Consistent NSS scores . Indicators of quality and standards:
Additional Requirements
GCSEs: The University normally requires a minimum 5 GCSEs including Mathematics/Numeracy and English at Grade C or Grade 4 or above, or their equivalent, but consideration is given to individual circumstances.
Inclusive Curriculum Statement
The University of South Wales operates a policy of inclusive learning, teaching and assessment to ensure that all students have an equal opportunity to fulfil their educational potential. Course teams will have considered ways of designing out any potentially disadvantageous element of courses during the course design process. However some specific needs may remain, details about how to apply to have your needs assessed can be found at: http://unilife.southwales.ac.uk/pages/3040-disability-and-dyslexia-service/
Addendum for Delivery at a Partner Institution
N/A
Methods Of Quality Standards
A: Mechanisms for review and evaluation:
Module reviews (student feedback questionnaires)
Annual Programme review
Periodic review which includes external panel members
Annual staff appraisal
Annual Monitoring and Evaluation Reports
Award / Subject External examiner reports
Reflection on Academic Practice
Faculty Learning, Teaching & Student Experience committee
B: Committees responsible for monitoring and evaluation
Programme board
Faculty Quality Assurance Committee
Quality Audit Committee
Staff/student liaison committee
Annual monitoring meeting
Subject Boards
Subject and Programme Examination Boards, with reporting annually by the External Examiner.
C: Mechanisms for gaining student feedback
National Student Survey
Student representation on Programme Board
Student Feedback Questionnaires
Meetings between campus based and partner institutions
D: Staff development activities to improve the programme
Providing resources for research, consultancy and scholarly activities, including attendance / presentation at conferences, seminars and workshops in UK and oversees
Providing resources for purchase of supporting educational material
Enabling links with Professional Institutions and industry
Annual staff appraisal to identify both individual and broader staff development needs contributing to Investors in People status.
University provision of basic staff development courses.
Quality Of Standards Indicators
This programme can demonstrate its quality through:
Internal moderation
Annual Reports by the External Examiner
Annual monitoring
Faculty Quality Assurance Committee auditors
Student feedback
Investors in People status
Highly supportive QAA institutional audit
Quality of degrees awarded in the subject area.
Industrial Advisory Committee
Industrial prizes awarded to achieving students
Healthy NSS scores (> 90%) in 2010.