MSc Gastroenterology

01 Sep 2026 - 31 Aug 2028

Course Leader Karl New
Course Team
Awarding Body University of South Wales
Teaching Institutions Learna Ltd
Modes of Study Part Time

Document Version

Version 2
Valid From 01 Sep 2026
Valid To 31 Aug 2028

QAA Benchmarks

N/A

Educational Aim

The main aims of the course are:

Development of graduates who can articulate professional decisions, incorporating an evidence based rationale, in a variety of diverse and complex situations related to gastroenterology.

Critical application of gastroenterology research to clinical practice.

Articulation of professional decisions, incorporating evidence based rationale, in a variety of diverse and complex situations related to gastroenterology.

Application of life-long learning and advanced problem-solving skills to clinical practice.

Leadership in the delivery and advancement of gastroenterology related care.

Leadership of teams in multi-agency, multi-cultural and/or international contexts.

Evaluation skills in the delivery of care to patients.

Learning Outcomes

A1 Apply conceptual and practical understanding of gastroenterology to the care of patients with gastroenterological conditions
A2 Critically appraise current developments affecting the care of patients undergoing gastroenterological procedures and treatments.
A3 Critically apply an advanced knowledge of gastroenterology to decision-making in unpredictable and/or complex situations
A4 Apply advanced knowledge of gastroenterology to meet the changing demands of health care systems taking into account the wider context within which gastroenterology is practiced
A5 Selectively adopt and use established research methods to create and interpret knowledge in settings related to gastroenterology
A6 Critically analyse and evaluate the choice of research tools and/or other methods of enquiry to address research problems
B1 Critically evaluate current research in gastroenterology
B2 Critically apply independent learning skills in the exploration of knowledge and enquiry to underpin practice
B3 Demonstrate reflection and creativity in addressing problematic situations that involve many interacting factors in gastroenterology related problems
B4 Analyse, synthesise and evaluate a variety of sources of information that underpin practice
B5 Exercise initiative and personal responsibility in decision-making in complex and unpredictable situations
C1 Deliver management strategies for the investigation and treatment of patients with gastroenterological conditions
C2 Critically appraise current and potential practical gastroenterological treatments for use in a variety of population groups
C3 Initiate and lead complex tasks and processes, taking responsibility, where relevant, for the work and roles of others in the multi-agency, multi-cultural and/or international contexts
C4 Analyse, plan and develop courses of action that initiate or underpin substantial developments in gastroenterology related practice
C5 Critically apply research or other methodologies to address problematic clinical or organisational situations

Course Structure

Level 7 Modules

Module Code Module Id Module Title Module Status Credit Value Module Type
PE4D035 MOD010414 Professional Project: Gastroenterology Running 40 specified
PE4S175 MOD010407 Oesophagus Running 20 specified
PE4S176 MOD010408 Stomach Running 20 specified
PE4S177 MOD010409 Pancreas Running 20 specified
PE4S178 MOD010410 Liver Running 20 specified
PE4S179 MOD010411 Small Bowel and Nutrition Running 20 specified
PE4S180 MOD010412 Colon Running 20 specified
PE4S181 MOD010413 Research Methodologies and Critical Appraisal: Gastroenterology Running 20 specified

Teaching and Assessment


Learning and Teaching Methods

Online learningThe course is delivered completely online using the assessment methods discussed below. 1,400 hours (78%). Years 1 & 2Independent StudyStudents are required to complete their professional project during module 2. This is typically a literature review. 400 hours (22%), Year 2The first year of the MSc comprises six modules of 20 credits, examining aspects of gastroenterology and the second year teaches research methods (one 20 credit module) and a 40 credit professional project module. The modules run sequentially. The format of the first seven modules follows a similar pattern and the final module is an extended piece of self-directed work guided by a tutor.The course is wholly on-line and can be accessed by any student with a computer and access to the internet. For all but the last 40 credit module, students are put in virtual tutor groups of 10-15 and they use a discussion forum to interact with the tutor and rest of the group for all modules. During a module, students will use the course website several times a week to follow discussion threads, make their own contributions and interact with the tutor and fellow students. There is no didactic teaching, instead, students are asked questions and prompted to go and search the literature, read it critically and respond on the course website.

Employer Engagement

Employer Engagement will be achieved by:

Work-based Learning

As post-graduate professionals, students are usually already employed in a related area. They are responsible for their own learning but where opportunities exist to enhance the practice area students are encouraged to engage with employers, particularly for the professional project.


Means of Assessment

There are four components of assessment to assess the learning outcomes of each module except the final 40 credit module of the MSc.

Case based scenarios and discussion 40%

Clinically focussed case problems reflective of day-to-day clinical practice/research will be presented for the student to consider and answer every week. After answering formative multi-choice questions, explanations are delivered and students discuss the concepts being tested in the case within their online group discussion forum facilitated throughout the module by their tutor and marked by them at the end of the module.

Students learn by finding relevant literature, reading and critically appraising it; discussing it within the discussion forum and applying it critically to practice. Engaging in case problems is highly motivational for students and introduces the key concepts of the module. It is perceived as being particularly valid for their clinical work and is a prominent feature found in the needs assessments of practising healthcare professionals.

The content of case discussion is based on the learning outcomes for the module.

Reflective portfolio 10%

The online learning portfolio requires students to record and critically reflect on their learning. Reflection is an important aspect of the course since the healthcare professionals will be able to spend time considering how their practice compares to the themes being discussed in the module. The tutor provides feedback to the student weekly and marks it at the end of the module. Reflective practice is a requirement for healthcare professionals for professional re-validation and professional development.

Group activity 20%

The group activity stimulates and tests the student’s ability to work individually and as a team in taking the subject area of gastroenterology forward. A group task is set, such as the development of a care guideline. The group elects a leader (designed to put leadership skills into practice) and the leader allocates tasks to group members. The leader is responsible for managing, collating and submitting the activity (online) at the end of the module. All students contribute to the group activity and provide an individual submission on some aspect of the subject. The tutor provides guidance throughout the module and marks the assessment at the end.

Case based exam 30%

Case problems in the form of a timed examination with ‘single best answer’ questions directly test the reasoning and knowledge of the objectives of the module. The online exam is marked automatically and lasts one hour in the six modules of post-graduate diploma and one and a half hours for the Research Methods module in the MSc. The extra time for this module is due to the time required to make calculations. The online exam is marked automatically.

The 40 credit final module allows students to explore a subject in-depth using study skills learnt previously on the course and is guided by one-to-one tutor supervision. Students and tutors will normally be in contact frequently during the first eight weeks when the topic and method of study is chosen. The mode of contact is decided between student and tutor. Supervision is maintained between student and tutor through a communication log on the course website for the duration of the module.

The diverse assessment methods within each module are designed to test the expected characteristics of masters graduates (QAA Characteristics’ Statement, 2015). These include critical awareness of current issues and developments in gastroenterology, critical skills, knowledge of professional responsibility, integrity and ethics and the ability to reflect on their own progress as a learner.


Learning Support

The learning support available through the course

Induction

Introductory lectures are held at the beginning of every cohort, introducing students to the library, navigation of the learning platform Moodle, and study skills support.

For students who cannot attend the lectures, they are filmed and uploaded to Moodle for students to watch before the course commences.

Personal tutor

One tutor per 10-15 students guides student learning and is available for academic support and contactable via Moodle.

Office hours

9-5 Mon to Friday for support with the learning platform

Formative Assessment

Each module provides students with a formative weekly case scenario quiz. Answers are provided and these are used to stimulate debate and further self-directed learning

Research Supervision

Individual supervision between tutor and student is provided for the professional project. Guidance on frequency and format is given on the course web-site and in the student handbook

Online Resources

Directed reading is provided on the course web-site

Advice Centres

Students have full access to the University of South Wales Advice Centre as well have a designated in-house student support team for the full duration of the course.

DDS Service

Students have access to the University of South Wales service

IT/Library

Students have full access to the University of South Wales library.

Course Exit Points

Award Criteria Final
Master of Science 180 credits of which at least 150 must be at Level 7 and no more than 30 at Level 6 Final
Postgraduate Diploma 120 credits of which at least 90 must be at Level 7 and no more than 30 at Level 6 Intermediate
Postgraduate Certificate 60 credits with at least 40 at Level 7 and no more than 20 at Level 6 Intermediate

Progression Route


Entry Requirements

Admission to the course is typically through the following qualifications:

Admission to the course is typically through the following qualifications;

First degree or equivalent (including international qualifications)

Relevant professional healthcare (e.g. doctor, nurse) qualifications

Those without recognised qualifications will be considered on an individual basis and a wide range of prior experience may be taken into account. The RPL process is in line with the University of South Wales’ regulations and students seeking to access this mechanism will submit evidence to the Course Director at Learna Ltd. The portfolio will subsequently be examined in liaison with the Course Link at the Faculty of Life Science and Education.

Language requirements for overseas applications are in line with USW requirements for postgraduate study.


Inclusive Curriculum Statement

The University of South Wales operates a policy of inclusive learning, teaching and assessment to ensure that all students have an equal opportunity to fulfil their educational potential. Course teams will have considered ways of designing out any potentially disadvantageous element of courses during the course design process. However some specific needs may remain, details about how to apply to have your needs assessed can be found at: http://unilife.southwales.ac.uk/pages/3040-disability-and-dyslexia-service/


Addendum for Delivery at a Partner Institution

N/A


Methods Of Quality Standards

Course Management

\\r

The course management follows the University requirements for partner organisations and adopts the University’s quality assurance processes: for example, module evaluations are completed at the end of each module and fed into the annual monitoring process for partner organisations; academic infringements follow USW procedures utilising the Faculty’s Advice Shop.

\\r

The University provides a Faculty link person (Karl New) who oversees all links with Learna Ltd. Each course also has its own course link tutor provided by USW, who works in partnership with Learna Ltd.

\\r

Learna Ltd also has its own internal quality assurance processes. These include a Course Director who is a subject expert with oversight of the course content, currency and quality. The Course Director internally moderates tutor training, input and marking, and oversees the question setting process. The Course Director is held accountable for the course at termly Academic Directorate meetings held jointly between USW and Learna Ltd. At these meetings courses are reviewed and quality assurance issues addressed. The University Faculty link person attends the meeting and provides updates on USW quality assurance procedures. This process ensures that changes to USW policies and procedures are fed back to Learna Ltd. in a timely manner.

\\r

Transitional Arrangements for Current Students (if applicable)

\\r

Not applicable. This is a new course.

\\r

Arrangements for Feedback to Students

\\r

Student provisional results and feedback are provided within 20 working days after the submission deadline. Before provisional results and feedback are released, the results are quality checked. Individual feedback is provided on the course website once students have completed the module feedback form.

\\r

On completion of the MSc, the University’s Subject Assessment Board will ratify the marks for each module and following the Award and Progression Board, students will be notified of their official results.

\\r

Student Representation

\\r

The on-line nature of the course and geographical spread of students precludes student attendance at University meetings. Feedback is obtained from all students at the end of each module and the end of the course. The Course Director and Learna’s Academic Board review comments and suggestions are incorporated where appropriate.


Quality Of Standards Indicators

Course Monitoring

\\r

The University is responsible for both the standards of its awards and for the quality of its students’ learning experience. In order to ensure that standards are maintained and there is continuous enhancement a process of regular review, known as annual monitoring take places. This purpose of the process is to evaluate and improve course quality, ensure the best possible student experience within the resource available and to identify and disseminate good practice. It also ensures that appropriate action is taken to remedy any identified shortcomings and enhance provision.

\\r

The mandatory student feedback obtained from all students is fed into the module review forms and made available to the course leader.

\\r

External Examiner

\\r

External examining provides one of the principal means for maintaining UK academic standards within autonomous higher education providers. The majority are drawn from other higher education institutions in the UK. In some cases, there will be external examiners drawn from industry or practice.

\\r

They provide carefully considered advice on the academic standards of the courses and/or modules to which they have been assigned, and can offer advice on good practice and opportunities to enhance the quality of those courses/modules. They are also able to offer an informed view of how standards compare with the same or similar awards at other higher education providers (primarily in the UK, and sometimes overseas as well) of which they have experience.

\\r

External examiners provide of annual written reports to the University based on what he/she has observed of the University’s assessment processes and student assessed work.

\\r

The external examiner(s) associated with this course are recorded in the Course Handbook.

\\r

Engagement with Subject Benchmark Statements, QAA Quality Code, CQFW and FHEQ

\\r

The QAA Master’s degree characteristics (September 2015) and the Credit and Qualifications Framework for Wales (2009). There are no subject specific benchmark statements for gastroenterology.