MSc Gastroenterology
01 Sep 2026 - 31 Aug 2028
| Course Leader | Karl New |
|---|---|
| Course Team | |
| Awarding Body | University of South Wales |
| Teaching Institutions | Learna Ltd |
| Modes of Study | Part Time |
Document Version
| Version | 2 |
|---|---|
| Valid From | 01 Sep 2026 |
| Valid To | 31 Aug 2028 |
QAA Benchmarks
Educational Aim
The main aims of the course are:
Development of graduates who can articulate professional decisions, incorporating an evidence based rationale, in a variety of diverse and complex situations related to gastroenterology.
Critical application of gastroenterology research to clinical practice.
Articulation of professional decisions, incorporating evidence based rationale, in a variety of diverse and complex situations related to gastroenterology.
Application of life-long learning and advanced problem-solving skills to clinical practice.
Leadership in the delivery and advancement of gastroenterology related care.
Leadership of teams in multi-agency, multi-cultural and/or international contexts.
Evaluation skills in the delivery of care to patients.
Learning Outcomes
| A1 | Apply conceptual and practical understanding of gastroenterology to the care of patients with gastroenterological conditions |
| A2 | Critically appraise current developments affecting the care of patients undergoing gastroenterological procedures and treatments. |
| A3 | Critically apply an advanced knowledge of gastroenterology to decision-making in unpredictable and/or complex situations |
| A4 | Apply advanced knowledge of gastroenterology to meet the changing demands of health care systems taking into account the wider context within which gastroenterology is practiced |
| A5 | Selectively adopt and use established research methods to create and interpret knowledge in settings related to gastroenterology |
| A6 | Critically analyse and evaluate the choice of research tools and/or other methods of enquiry to address research problems |
| B1 | Critically evaluate current research in gastroenterology |
| B2 | Critically apply independent learning skills in the exploration of knowledge and enquiry to underpin practice |
| B3 | Demonstrate reflection and creativity in addressing problematic situations that involve many interacting factors in gastroenterology related problems |
| B4 | Analyse, synthesise and evaluate a variety of sources of information that underpin practice |
| B5 | Exercise initiative and personal responsibility in decision-making in complex and unpredictable situations |
| C1 | Deliver management strategies for the investigation and treatment of patients with gastroenterological conditions |
| C2 | Critically appraise current and potential practical gastroenterological treatments for use in a variety of population groups |
| C3 | Initiate and lead complex tasks and processes, taking responsibility, where relevant, for the work and roles of others in the multi-agency, multi-cultural and/or international contexts |
| C4 | Analyse, plan and develop courses of action that initiate or underpin substantial developments in gastroenterology related practice |
| C5 | Critically apply research or other methodologies to address problematic clinical or organisational situations |
Course Structure
Level 7 Modules
| Module Code | Module Id | Module Title | Module Status | Credit Value | Module Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE4D035 | MOD010414 | Professional Project: Gastroenterology | Running | 40 | specified |
| PE4S175 | MOD010407 | Oesophagus | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S176 | MOD010408 | Stomach | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S177 | MOD010409 | Pancreas | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S178 | MOD010410 | Liver | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S179 | MOD010411 | Small Bowel and Nutrition | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S180 | MOD010412 | Colon | Running | 20 | specified |
| PE4S181 | MOD010413 | Research Methodologies and Critical Appraisal: Gastroenterology | Running | 20 | specified |
Teaching and Assessment
Learning and Teaching Methods
Employer Engagement
Employer Engagement will be achieved by:
Work-based Learning
As post-graduate professionals, students are usually already employed in a related area. They are responsible for their own learning but where opportunities exist to enhance the practice area students are encouraged to engage with employers, particularly for the professional project.
Means of Assessment
There are four components of assessment to assess the learning outcomes of each module except the final 40 credit module of the MSc.
Case based scenarios and discussion 40%
Clinically focussed case problems reflective of day-to-day clinical practice/research will be presented for the student to consider and answer every week. After answering formative multi-choice questions, explanations are delivered and students discuss the concepts being tested in the case within their online group discussion forum facilitated throughout the module by their tutor and marked by them at the end of the module.
Students learn by finding relevant literature, reading and critically appraising it; discussing it within the discussion forum and applying it critically to practice. Engaging in case problems is highly motivational for students and introduces the key concepts of the module. It is perceived as being particularly valid for their clinical work and is a prominent feature found in the needs assessments of practising healthcare professionals.
The content of case discussion is based on the learning outcomes for the module.
Reflective portfolio 10%
The online learning portfolio requires students to record and critically reflect on their learning. Reflection is an important aspect of the course since the healthcare professionals will be able to spend time considering how their practice compares to the themes being discussed in the module. The tutor provides feedback to the student weekly and marks it at the end of the module. Reflective practice is a requirement for healthcare professionals for professional re-validation and professional development.
Group activity 20%
The group activity stimulates and tests the student’s ability to work individually and as a team in taking the subject area of gastroenterology forward. A group task is set, such as the development of a care guideline. The group elects a leader (designed to put leadership skills into practice) and the leader allocates tasks to group members. The leader is responsible for managing, collating and submitting the activity (online) at the end of the module. All students contribute to the group activity and provide an individual submission on some aspect of the subject. The tutor provides guidance throughout the module and marks the assessment at the end.
Case based exam 30%
Case problems in the form of a timed examination with ‘single best answer’ questions directly test the reasoning and knowledge of the objectives of the module. The online exam is marked automatically and lasts one hour in the six modules of post-graduate diploma and one and a half hours for the Research Methods module in the MSc. The extra time for this module is due to the time required to make calculations. The online exam is marked automatically.
The 40 credit final module allows students to explore a subject in-depth using study skills learnt previously on the course and is guided by one-to-one tutor supervision. Students and tutors will normally be in contact frequently during the first eight weeks when the topic and method of study is chosen. The mode of contact is decided between student and tutor. Supervision is maintained between student and tutor through a communication log on the course website for the duration of the module.
The diverse assessment methods within each module are designed to test the expected characteristics of masters graduates (QAA Characteristics’ Statement, 2015). These include critical awareness of current issues and developments in gastroenterology, critical skills, knowledge of professional responsibility, integrity and ethics and the ability to reflect on their own progress as a learner.
Learning Support
The learning support available through the course
Induction
Introductory lectures are held at the beginning of every cohort, introducing students to the library, navigation of the learning platform Moodle, and study skills support.
For students who cannot attend the lectures, they are filmed and uploaded to Moodle for students to watch before the course commences.
Personal tutor
One tutor per 10-15 students guides student learning and is available for academic support and contactable via Moodle.
Office hours
9-5 Mon to Friday for support with the learning platform
Formative Assessment
Each module provides students with a formative weekly case scenario quiz. Answers are provided and these are used to stimulate debate and further self-directed learning
Research Supervision
Individual supervision between tutor and student is provided for the professional project. Guidance on frequency and format is given on the course web-site and in the student handbook
Online Resources
Directed reading is provided on the course web-site
Advice Centres
Students have full access to the University of South Wales Advice Centre as well have a designated in-house student support team for the full duration of the course.
DDS Service
Students have access to the University of South Wales service
IT/Library
Students have full access to the University of South Wales library.
Course Exit Points
| Award | Criteria | Final |
|---|---|---|
| Master of Science | 180 credits of which at least 150 must be at Level 7 and no more than 30 at Level 6 | Final |
| Postgraduate Diploma | 120 credits of which at least 90 must be at Level 7 and no more than 30 at Level 6 | Intermediate |
| Postgraduate Certificate | 60 credits with at least 40 at Level 7 and no more than 20 at Level 6 | Intermediate |
Progression Route
Entry Requirements
Admission to the course is typically through the following qualifications:
Admission to the course is typically through the following qualifications;
First degree or equivalent (including international qualifications)
Relevant professional healthcare (e.g. doctor, nurse) qualifications
Those without recognised qualifications will be considered on an individual basis and a wide range of prior experience may be taken into account. The RPL process is in line with the University of South Wales’ regulations and students seeking to access this mechanism will submit evidence to the Course Director at Learna Ltd. The portfolio will subsequently be examined in liaison with the Course Link at the Faculty of Life Science and Education.
Language requirements for overseas applications are in line with USW requirements for postgraduate study.
Inclusive Curriculum Statement
The University of South Wales operates a policy of inclusive learning, teaching and assessment to ensure that all students have an equal opportunity to fulfil their educational potential. Course teams will have considered ways of designing out any potentially disadvantageous element of courses during the course design process. However some specific needs may remain, details about how to apply to have your needs assessed can be found at: http://unilife.southwales.ac.uk/pages/3040-disability-and-dyslexia-service/
Addendum for Delivery at a Partner Institution
N/A
Methods Of Quality Standards
Course Management
\\rThe course management follows the University requirements for partner organisations and adopts the University’s quality assurance processes: for example, module evaluations are completed at the end of each module and fed into the annual monitoring process for partner organisations; academic infringements follow USW procedures utilising the Faculty’s Advice Shop.
\\rThe University provides a Faculty link person (Karl New) who oversees all links with Learna Ltd. Each course also has its own course link tutor provided by USW, who works in partnership with Learna Ltd.
\\rLearna Ltd also has its own internal quality assurance processes. These include a Course Director who is a subject expert with oversight of the course content, currency and quality. The Course Director internally moderates tutor training, input and marking, and oversees the question setting process. The Course Director is held accountable for the course at termly Academic Directorate meetings held jointly between USW and Learna Ltd. At these meetings courses are reviewed and quality assurance issues addressed. The University Faculty link person attends the meeting and provides updates on USW quality assurance procedures. This process ensures that changes to USW policies and procedures are fed back to Learna Ltd. in a timely manner.
\\rTransitional Arrangements for Current Students (if applicable)
\\rNot applicable. This is a new course.
\\rArrangements for Feedback to Students
\\rStudent provisional results and feedback are provided within 20 working days after the submission deadline. Before provisional results and feedback are released, the results are quality checked. Individual feedback is provided on the course website once students have completed the module feedback form.
\\rOn completion of the MSc, the University’s Subject Assessment Board will ratify the marks for each module and following the Award and Progression Board, students will be notified of their official results.
\\rStudent Representation
\\rThe on-line nature of the course and geographical spread of students precludes student attendance at University meetings. Feedback is obtained from all students at the end of each module and the end of the course. The Course Director and Learna’s Academic Board review comments and suggestions are incorporated where appropriate.
Quality Of Standards Indicators
Course Monitoring
\\rThe University is responsible for both the standards of its awards and for the quality of its students’ learning experience. In order to ensure that standards are maintained and there is continuous enhancement a process of regular review, known as annual monitoring take places. This purpose of the process is to evaluate and improve course quality, ensure the best possible student experience within the resource available and to identify and disseminate good practice. It also ensures that appropriate action is taken to remedy any identified shortcomings and enhance provision.
\\rThe mandatory student feedback obtained from all students is fed into the module review forms and made available to the course leader.
\\rExternal Examiner
\\rExternal examining provides one of the principal means for maintaining UK academic standards within autonomous higher education providers. The majority are drawn from other higher education institutions in the UK. In some cases, there will be external examiners drawn from industry or practice.
\\rThey provide carefully considered advice on the academic standards of the courses and/or modules to which they have been assigned, and can offer advice on good practice and opportunities to enhance the quality of those courses/modules. They are also able to offer an informed view of how standards compare with the same or similar awards at other higher education providers (primarily in the UK, and sometimes overseas as well) of which they have experience.
\\rExternal examiners provide of annual written reports to the University based on what he/she has observed of the University’s assessment processes and student assessed work.
\\rThe external examiner(s) associated with this course are recorded in the Course Handbook.
\\rEngagement with Subject Benchmark Statements, QAA Quality Code, CQFW and FHEQ
\\rThe QAA Master’s degree characteristics (September 2015) and the Credit and Qualifications Framework for Wales (2009). There are no subject specific benchmark statements for gastroenterology.